<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon EOS 50D Review Round-Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photocrati.com/canon-eos-50d-review-round-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photocrati.com/canon-eos-50d-review-round-up/</link>
	<description>Photo Wordpress Themes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:45:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tintenpatrone</title>
		<link>http://www.photocrati.com/canon-eos-50d-review-round-up/comment-page-1/#comment-7294</link>
		<dc:creator>tintenpatrone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photocrati.com/?p=1047#comment-7294</guid>
		<description>The canon Canon EOS 50D is really an amazing camera. The pictures are really aweseome. It think it is really light for its strength. Can anybody recommend a good printer for the camera or is it better to use a copystore?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The canon Canon EOS 50D is really an amazing camera. The pictures are really aweseome. It think it is really light for its strength. Can anybody recommend a good printer for the camera or is it better to use a copystore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Manoian</title>
		<link>http://www.photocrati.com/canon-eos-50d-review-round-up/comment-page-1/#comment-3579</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Manoian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photocrati.com/?p=1047#comment-3579</guid>
		<description>I have used the 50D for quite some time now (http://www.paulmanoian.com/) and there&#039;s no denying the images it produces are much softer than the 40D at the pixel level. This is to be expected in a camera that bumps the resolution up 50% on the same-sized sensor simply because there is less wiggle room. It is essential to use top quality optics with this body if you want to take advantage of the higher levels of detail the body is capable of capturing. Images captured with lenses, that were considered &quot;decent&quot; on other bodies, may appear fuzzy since the optics are not capable of focusing as sharply as needed. My &quot;L&quot; lenses do very well. My other lenses, well, I sold them since this body REQUIRES pinpoint focusing capabilities.  If the lens provides a less-than-perfect image to the sensor, the 15MP sensor will definitely capture a blurry image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used the 50D for quite some time now (<a href="http://www.paulmanoian.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.paulmanoian.com/</a>) and there&#8217;s no denying the images it produces are much softer than the 40D at the pixel level. This is to be expected in a camera that bumps the resolution up 50% on the same-sized sensor simply because there is less wiggle room. It is essential to use top quality optics with this body if you want to take advantage of the higher levels of detail the body is capable of capturing. Images captured with lenses, that were considered &#8220;decent&#8221; on other bodies, may appear fuzzy since the optics are not capable of focusing as sharply as needed. My &#8220;L&#8221; lenses do very well. My other lenses, well, I sold them since this body REQUIRES pinpoint focusing capabilities.  If the lens provides a less-than-perfect image to the sensor, the 15MP sensor will definitely capture a blurry image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

