Comments on: Nikon 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G AF-S DX ED VR II Review: Field Test Report

By: RevDaws

RevDaws — Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:38:24 +0000

Sorry, meant to say Nikon is more expensive than Tamron.

By: RevDaws

RevDaws — Mon, 11 Jul 2011 08:21:34 +0000

Thanks Peter. But pushing you further, how does the Nikon 18-200 compare with the Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD regarding optics/clarity etc? I’m in Sydney, Australia and the Nikon is considerably more expensive than the Nikon, but if the Nikon is truly better I will consider it. Thanks.

By: Peter K Burian

Peter K Burian — Sat, 09 Jul 2011 02:32:28 +0000

Get the Nikon 18-200 …. best lens of its type and definitely better than the 55-200,

P.,

By: chip

chip — Fri, 08 Jul 2011 12:26:42 +0000

Also considering the D7000. Looking at buying body only with either the 18-200 or 18-55 and 55-200. I’ll save a lot by going for the two lens option, will I also be getting better quality. The only advantage I can see with the 18-200 is convenience.

By: RevDaws

RevDaws — Thu, 07 Jul 2011 15:08:12 +0000

I am considering buying the Nikon D7000 and want a general purpose zoom. How does this lens (Nikon AF-S DX 18-200mm f3.5-5.6G ED VR II) compare with the Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Lens? Thanks.

By: Sasi

Sasi — Mon, 13 Jun 2011 02:05:31 +0000

With D3100 can i take pictures of wild life? ex: birds

By: Sasi

Sasi — Mon, 13 Jun 2011 01:54:56 +0000

Hello, Peter i like to know how much distance can i cover with this lens? Thank you ,Sasi

By: Peter K Burian

Peter K Burian — Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:44:24 +0000

Sure, this lens is perfect for any of those cameras, D3000, D3100, D5000, etc. etc. etc.

Autofocus is available with ANY lens designated AF-S.

That means it includes the ultrasonic Silent Wave Focus motor.

By: mgmoradillla

mgmoradillla — Mon, 04 Apr 2011 09:50:01 +0000

i have D3000 it advisable to use 18-200 lens?

By: Jheyem

Jheyem — Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:14:33 +0000

Does D3100 supports AutoFocus on this Lens? Thanks!